List three indicators that a traveler might be involved in smuggling or illicit activity.

• A. Consistent travel history
• B. Clear statements across questions
• C. Contradictory statements, inconsistent travel history, concealed or unusual baggage
• D. Documentation corroboration with known facts

Answer: (C)

The main idea here is recognizing signals in a traveler’s behavior and documentation that raise suspicion of illicit activity. The strongest indicators are when statements clash or don’t add up, and when baggage appears hidden or unusual. Contradictory statements and an inconsistent travel history suggest that the traveler may be trying to conceal information or evade proper screening. When this is combined with concealed or unusual baggage, it points to a higher likelihood of smuggling or illicit items being involved. Together, these signs create a pattern that warrants closer questioning or inspection.

By contrast, a traveler who provides consistent statements across questions, has a coherent travel history, and shows documentation that aligns with known facts generally reflects legitimate travel and does not by itself indicate illicit activity.