How would you handle a project with a coworker when you have differing opinions and there are no supervisor instructions?

• A. Ignore the conflict and proceed.
• B. Ask why and facilitate a discussion on how to proceed.
• C. Demand that the other person adopt your approach.
• D. Document the disagreement and escalate to a supervisor.

Answer: (B)

When you’re on a project with a coworker and there are no supervisor instructions, the key skill is collaborative problem solving through clear, respectful communication. The best move is to ask why each person believes their approach is best and then facilitate a discussion on how to proceed. By inviting the other person to vocalize their reasoning, you uncover the assumptions, goals, and constraints behind each option. Listening actively and restating what you heard ensures both sides feel understood, which builds trust and paves the way to a practical plan.

From there, you can identify shared objectives, outline risks and requirements, and explore options that incorporate elements of both viewpoints or agree on a flexible plan with a concrete next step and timeline. This approach keeps the project moving, preserves the working relationship, and demonstrates initiative and professionalism.

The other paths fall short in different ways. Ignoring the conflict leaves hidden issues to fester and risks misalignment or damaged deliverables. Demanding that the other person adopt your approach is confrontational and damages collaboration. Escalating to a supervisor without first attempting to resolve it can delay progress, though escalation remains an option if the discussion cannot reach a workable solution or if there are clear policy or risk considerations.